March 30, 
					2007
					
					
					Notes on Baptist Associations 
					– In the 
					early 1800’s, in Baptists on the American Frontier 
					(p.254-5), the Baptist preacher and evangelist John Taylor 
					made these comments about Baptist associations: “Nothing is 
					more preposterous than to imagine that a Baptist association 
					can make a constitution for the churches, for the churches 
					have their own constitutions before they can make an 
					association, which is a mere creation of the churches. If a 
					church can delegate her power into other hands, she can have 
					no power with herself till it is restored back by those 
					delegates. This may do for other societies, but as yet it 
					will not do for the Baptists, for their belief is that 
					associations can make any rules for their own government 
					while together, and no more. 
					
					“Perhaps it 
					is very well that this little establishment has come into 
					existence in the way it has, that all associations may sink 
					into disrepute and die a natural death at once, or crumble 
					up four churches together and die by degrees. For I do 
					declare, ‘If associations are to have more power than mere 
					advisory counsel, I wish them all dead at once.’… 
					
					“I have 
					therein had the opportunity of giving my views of a Baptist 
					association, for which we have very little authority from 
					the Scriptures. I also much doubt their utility in this day, 
					for by the pride or wrath of man they are often like the 
					synagogues of Satan… I fear that they will some day overturn 
					the simple, easy government of the church of Christ among 
					the Baptists, for there is now a number of the poor Baptists 
					who incline to use them as a kind of appellate court. Their 
					being brought into existence should be with the greatest 
					care, the extent of their powers being understood from the 
					beginning. And so long as they are only advisory, they can 
					do not harm. Remove from them that role, and they are 
					destruction at once.” Read Acts 20:28; Ephesians 5:23. 
					Topics: 
					Church Independence, Associations, Fellowships, 
					Denominations, Baptist Church Doctrine, Headship of Christ 
					March 29, 
					2007
					
					
					Relentless Beat of Rock Music 
					– “The 
					difference between the constant, hypnotic beat of rock and 
					its ancestral rhythms and genuine musical rhythm has been 
					well put by the distinguished Russian composer Igor 
					Stravinsky: ‘Rhythm doesn’t really exist [in rock], because 
					no rhythmic proportion or relaxation exists.’ There is 
					evidence to suggest that when the beat overrides the other 
					elements in a song the communication level is significantly 
					changed to one which is primarily physical and often 
					specifically sexual. Rock musician Tom McSloy has no doubts 
					about this: ‘To get into rock you have to give in to it, let 
					it inside, flow with it to the point where it consumes you, 
					and all you can feel or hear or think about is the music.’… 
					
					“What we 
					are saying is that the element of relentless beat and 
					repetition in rock music increases the danger of a shallow, 
					emotional, unthinking response, made at the wrong level and 
					for the wrong reasons. In his book New Singer, New Song 
					David Winter openly admits that ‘An incessant beat does 
					erode a sense of responsibility in much the same way as 
					alcohol does… You feel in the grip of a relentless stream of 
					sound to which something very basic and primitive in the 
					human nature responds.’” –from Can We Rock the Gospel 
					(p.56-57) by John Blanchard and Dan Lucarini. Read 
					1Corinthians 6:12; Psalm 40:3. 
					
					Topics: 
					Music, Rock Music, Rhythm, Beat
					
					 
					
					
					Music is the Message 
					– Dr. 
					William J. Shafer “says, ‘Rock is communication without 
					words, regardless of what ideology is inserted into the 
					music.’” Professor Frank Garlock “claims, ‘The words only 
					let you know what the music already says… The music is its 
					own message and it can completely change the message of the 
					words.’ What all of this is saying is that rock music is 
					rock music, not just a plastic medium that can be bent in 
					any direction. Even John Fischer, who believes that music is 
					neutral, admits, ‘Some art forms have been created to 
					express certain philosophies and are so wedded to those 
					philosophies that they convey that kind of outlook.’ Even 
					more significantly he adds, ‘We can’t assume that we simply 
					plug in a Christian message and everything will be okay.’ 
					
					“Surely it 
					is not difficult to relate this to today’s Christian rock 
					scene? Richard Taylor sums up the fatal flaw in the argument 
					that Christian rock is somehow different: ‘We cannot change 
					the basic effect of certain kinds of rhythm and beat simply 
					be attaching to them a few religious or semi-religious 
					words. The beat will still get through to the blood of the 
					participants and the listeners. Words are timid things. 
					Decibels and beat are bold things, which can so easily bury 
					the words under an avalanche of sound.’” –from Can We 
					Rock the Gospel? (p.210-211) by John Blanchard and Dan 
					Lucarini. Read Ezekiel 28:13-15.  
					
					Topics: 
					Music, Rock Music, Rhythm, Beat. 
					 
					March 28, 
					2007
					
					
					Boston Baptists and Their First Church Building 
					– The First 
					Baptist Church of Boston, Massachusetts, struggled under 
					persecution from the ruling religious establishment for 
					years. Sometime after 1675, they quietly began to build 
					their first church building. “This building was so plain 
					that it did not attract the attention of the Boston 
					authorities until it was completed and the church began to 
					use it for worship on February 15, 1679. In May the General 
					Court passed a law forbidding the use of a house for public 
					worship without the consent of the court or a town meeting 
					on forfeiture of the house and land. Because of this, the 
					Baptists stopped using their own church edifice until King 
					Charles II required the authorities to allow liberty of 
					conscience to all Protestants. 
					
					“With this 
					approval, the Baptists went back to using their building 
					again. In spite of the king’s permission, the Court charged 
					them with a crime and on March 8, 1680, ordered the marshal 
					to nail the doors closed, which he did, posting the 
					following notice on the door: ‘All persons are to take 
					notice that, by order of the Court, the doors of this house 
					are shut up, and that they are inhibited to hold any 
					meetings therein, or to open the doors thereof, without 
					license from authority, till the Court take further order, 
					as they will answer the contrary to their peril. Edward 
					Rawson, Secretary.’
					
					“The 
					Baptists quietly petitioned the Court in May asking simply 
					for the right to meet in their own building, but the Court 
					continued to prohibit them as a society by themselves, or 
					joined with others, to meet in that public place they have 
					built, or any public place except such as are allowed by 
					lawful authority. The next Sunday the members of the church 
					held public services in the yard. That week they prepared a 
					shed for use on the next Sunday, but when they came to their 
					property, they found the doors open! Never stopping to ask 
					whether the marshal had opened them or the angel, which 
					threw open the iron gate for Peter, they went in boldly and 
					held their services in their own building. For nearly 70 
					years this was the only Baptist church in Boston. Since that 
					day, there has always been a great door and effectual opened 
					to Boston Baptists.” –from This Day in Baptist History 
					III (p.94-95) by David L. Cummins. Read Ezra 6:7; 9:8. 
					
					Topics: 
					Baptists, Freedom of Worship, Boston 
					 
					March 27, 
					2007
					
					
					Hypnotized by Rock Music 
					– “Mickey 
					Hart, formerly of the Grateful Dead, has made the study of 
					drumming his life’s work. In his book Drumming at the 
					Edge of Magic he explores the impact of drumming on 
					people’s spiritual lives and writes: ‘Drumming is made for 
					trance and for ecstatic states. The basis of percussion is 
					redundancy and redundancy is the basis of trance.’ 
					
					“Professor 
					William Shafer, a non-Christian sociologist, says, ‘What is 
					undeniable about rock is its hypnotic power. It has gripped 
					millions of young people around the world and transformed 
					their lives.’ Dr. Granville Knight agrees: ‘There is no 
					question in my mind about the hypnotic effect of these 
					songs.’ So does Dr. W. J. Bryan: ‘Children are being 
					hypnotized without their knowledge, and that is the really 
					insidious part about these records. The more often the 
					hypnotism is repeated the higher the susceptibility of the 
					subject.’
					
					“In the 
					course of his specialized study on hypnosis, Andrew Salter 
					indicated that rock music is an ideal vehicle for individual 
					or mass hypnosis. Even more telling is this statement by the 
					late Jimi Hendrix, one of the most dynamic and influential 
					superstars in rock music history: ‘Atmospheres are going to 
					come through music, because music is a spiritual thing of 
					its own. You can hypnotize people with the music and when 
					you get them at their weakest point you can preach into the 
					sub-conscious what you want to say.’” –from Can We Rock 
					the Gospel (p.54) by John Blanchard and Dan Lucarini. 
					Read 1Corinthians 6:12; 10:23. 
					
					Topics: 
					Music, Rock Music, Hypnosis, Drums 
					
					
					Helped by a Hypocrite 
					– In 
					Baptists on the American Frontier (p.357), Baptist 
					evangelist John Taylor tells of the salvation of one named 
					Isaac Wingate. “He coming home one evening, his wife 
					informed him of a meeting close at hand that night and asked 
					his company with her. After hearing who was to preach he 
					refused, saying, ‘You know I have a bad opinion of that man. 
					I consider him a hypocrite, and you must excuse me.’ But to 
					accommodate his wife, he went but with the design to pay no 
					attention, as he disliked the man. But that night the arrows 
					of God reached his soul, so that he could not extract them 
					till he found relief in the Lord… 
					
					“When 
					Wingate related his experience to the church, if weeping is 
					a childish thing the crowded house all became children; for 
					the most manly philosophy could not suppress tears. And poor 
					Wingate himself was under the same tender sensations. 
					‘Glory, glory to that God by whose sovereign grace the 
					loftiness of man is brought down to the dust of humility.’ 
					The conquered sinner was baptized the next day with his wife 
					and a number of others by the same man he once esteemed a 
					hypocrite.” Read Daniel 4:37. 
					
					Topics: 
					Salvation, Hypocrites, Pride, Humility
					 
					March 26, 
					2007
					
					
					Shortcomings of the Reformation 
					– “In 1807 
					Dr. Samuel Jones, pastor of the Baptist Church in Lower 
					Dublin, Pennsylvania, preached a Century Sermon 
					commemorating the Centennial of the Philadelphia Baptist 
					Association. Dr. Jones was one of the most influential 
					Baptist ministers in the Middle Colonies, and he served as 
					pastor of the Lower Dublin church for over fifty years until 
					his death in 1814. In his famed message he presented a 
					properly focused appreciation for the Reformation. He 
					recognized the eventual blessings that came out of the 
					Reformation, but he did not set the Reformers up as paragons 
					of spiritual enlightenment men whom we replicate. 
					
					“He said, 
					‘The reformation, which has been so much gloried in was but 
					a poor piece of business, although it has been attended with 
					valuable consequences. The reformers shook off the papal 
					yoke, but in the main retained its principles and spirit. 
					They did not establish the right of free inquiry, liberty of 
					conscience, and the word of God as the only rule of faith 
					and practice: but, on the other hand, opposed… a thorough 
					reformation. They were influenced by worldly motives, 
					connected religion with world establishments, were the 
					abettors of tyranny and oppression, and even of the 
					persecution by fire and the sword.’ 
					
					“Freedom of 
					religion in America came not through the theology of the 
					reformation, but rather through the influence of our godly 
					Baptist forebears. The historian, Leonard Woolsey Bacon put 
					it this way: ‘Other sects, notably the Presbyterians, had 
					been energetic and efficient in demanding their own 
					liberties; the Friends and the Baptists agreed in demanding 
					liberty of conscience and worship, and equality before the 
					law, for all alike. But the active labor in this cause was 
					mainly done by the Baptists. It is to their consistency and 
					constancy in the warfare against the privileges of the 
					powerful Standing Order of New England, and of the moribund 
					establishments of the South, that we are chiefly indebted 
					for the final triumph.’” –from This Day in Baptist 
					History III (p.77-78) by David L. Cummins. Read 
					Leviticus 25:10; Romans 14:5. 
					
					Topics: 
					Baptists, Samuel Jones, Liberty of Conscience, Freedom
					 
					March 23, 
					2007
					
					
					Character over Conduct 
					
					– “Many Christians are tired of serving the Lord simply for 
					some reward they will receive in the ‘by and by.’ They find 
					themselves living for the Lord out of duty and not 
					out of devotion. They think, ‘If I just do right, 
					then I will be right.’ The Bible makes clear that it is not 
					what you ‘do’ that counts with God; it is what you ‘be’ that 
					is important. It is character over conduct. As we get to 
					know 
					God, His character rubs off on us, and our conduct becomes 
					purely an extension of what we know. ‘For I desired mercy, 
					and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than 
					burnt offerings’ (Hosea 6:6, italics added). We have 
					been told for so long to ‘stand up for Jesus.’ However, we 
					must first learn to ‘sit down with Jesus.’ Our standing is 
					merely a temporary exercise if we have not learned how to 
					sit at His feet.” –from The God You Can Know by Dan 
					DeHaan (p.16). 
					
					God Powerful 
					
					– It is better to say, “God powerful, than say, the power of 
					God; because his power is not distinct from his essence… 
					This omnipotence is a peculiar right of God, wherein no 
					creature can share with him. To be omnipotent is to be 
					essentially God. And for a creature to be omnipotent, is for 
					a creature to be its own Creator… Omnipotence is essentially 
					in God; it is not distinct from the essence of God, it is 
					his essence, omnipotent, able to do all things.” –from 
					The Existence and Attributes of God: Volume 2 by Stephen 
					Charnock (p.18). 
					March 22, 
					2007
      					
						
						Trinity of Love 
						- 
						
					“God is love (1John 4:16). Love is the deepest element of 
					His life, the innermost fount out of which His nature 
					eternally flows forth, the creative centre that begets all 
					His working and ruling. But love is a trinity…
					
						- 
						it 
						always proceeds from the Lover:
- 
						it 
						always moves toward the Beloved:
- 
						it 
						always intertwines the two together through the common 
						Spirit of union…
					
					But the fact that three persons of the Godhead actually 
					correspond to these three fundamental conceptions of the 
					idea of God, this only the revelation of the eternal God 
					Himself can make known. The Father is the One out of 
					Himself existing, the Son is the One to Himself 
					attaining, and the Spirit the One in Himself moving 
					God. The Father is the Lover, the Son the Beloved, the Holy 
					Spirit is the Spirit of Love.” –from The Dawn of World 
					Redemption by Erich Sauer (p.19). 
					
					
					
					Satan’s Attacks on Prayers of 
					
					
					Faith 
					- “Satan’s tactics seem to be as follows. He will first of all 
					oppose our breaking through to the place of a real, living 
					faith, by all means in his power. He detests the prayer of 
					faith, for it is an authoritative ‘notice to quit.’ He does 
					not so much mind rambling, carnal prayers, for they do not 
					hurt him much. This is why it is so difficult to attain to a 
					definite faith in God for a definite object. We often have 
					to strive and wrestle in prayer (Ephesians 6:10) before we 
					attain this quiet, restful faith. And until we break right 
					through and join hands with God we have not attained 
					to real faith at all. Faith is a gift of God (Romans 12:9); 
					if we stop short of it we are using mere fleshly energy or 
					will-power, weapons of no value in this warfare. However, 
					once we attain to a real faith, all the forces of hell are 
					impotent to annul it. What then? They retire and muster 
					their forces on this plot of ground which God has pledged 
					Himself to give us, and contest every inch of it. The real 
					battle begins when the prayer of faith has been offered. 
					But, praise the Lord! We are on the winning side.” –from 
					Behind the Ranges by Mrs. Howard Taylor (p.114).