The Second and Third Epistles of John - Lesson 2
This course offers an in-depth look at the Second and Third Epistles of John.
The Meat Offering - Conclusion
At the Feast of Pentecost there was to be offered a new meat offering. The new meat offering was like other meat offerings in most regards. There was, however, to be one major difference. The new meat offering was to be offered with leaven. Leaven, the type of sin, was to be included. Why?
The Meat Offering - Part 2
Almost every scholar wants to change the meat offering to something else—although they cannot decide what else. The name is said to be confusing to Bible readers. The meat offering has no animal flesh. In fact, it is the only major offering in which no animals are killed. Why is it called the meat offering? Actually, there are very good reasons for calling it the meat offering.
The Meat Offering
The meat offering has a very special typology that is revealed plainly by the cross references to the word meat as used by Christ. The meat offering is the offering of a “living sacrifice”—the kind Christians are supposed to give (Romans 12:1). It is also the kind of sacrifice Christ gave during His earthly ministry.
The Acceptance of the Offering
This sermon is a continuation of the study of the book of Leviticus. It is not enough that the offering is brought; it must be acceptable to God. God must receive it.
A Thing Most Holy
The Meat Offering is a picture of the life of our Lord Jesus Christ and even points to His incarnation.
The Gospel of John VIII - Lesson 6
This course offers an in-depth verse-by-verse look at the Gospel of John.
The Gospel of John VIII - Lesson 4
This course offers an in-depth verse-by-verse look at the Gospel of John.
The Gospel of John VIII - Lesson 3
This course offers an in-depth verse-by-verse look at the Gospel of John.
Defining Bible Words
What is your method for finding definitions of biblical words? For example, the difference between "accursed" and "cursed" and the difference between "lucre" and "money". I know that the English of the KJV is correct; but, sometimes, isn't getting to the "root" of the word necessary?